IG Inspection Readiness

Inspection readiness is the most consequential unsolved problem in military software.

Every service runs IG inspections. Every unit rebuilds the same checklists from scratch. No purpose-built software exists anywhere in the Department of War. This is a concept for the platform that changes that.

Every Unit Runs the Same Broken Process

The IG inspection tempo is accelerating - 23 IGMC-published events in FY2026, up from 9 in FY2024. Units prepare using shared drives, binder systems, and tribal knowledge that walks out the door every PCS cycle. There is no structured, auditable, or persistent tool for inspection readiness anywhere across the five armed services.

156%
Increase in IGMC inspection tempo (FY24-FY26)
5 of 5
Services with zero purpose-built readiness software
~4,400
Inspectable commands across all services

Three Tiers, One Architecture

A single platform that scales from the Sergeant running a pre-inspection in a motor pool to the Commandant reviewing force-wide readiness before Congress. Not three products - one system at three levels of institutional ambition.

Tier 1
Intelligence Core
Server-side agent with a curated knowledge base - every FAC, regulation, and best practice. The brain that powers everything downstream.
Tier 2
Operational Tools
Unit-facing apps - from the Sergeant's phone to the XO's dashboard to the analyst's trend view. The intelligence, delivered to every echelon.
Tier 3
Enterprise Decision Support
CMC-level readiness visibility, congressional reporting, cross-service expansion. The strategic asset the institution has never had.
See the full concept brief

Before Proposing a Build, We Built the Business Case

6 Services
Analyzed independently - USMC, Army, Navy, Air Force, Space Force, Coast Guard
30+ Regulations
Service-level orders, DON instructions, and IG directives mapped
4,200+ Lines
Of structured research across TAM, regulatory, and competitive analysis
Zero
Comparable products found in SAM.gov, FPDS, or commercial markets

This research corpus is the beginning of the knowledge base the intelligence core would run on.

Have Thoughts on This Concept?

Whether you have domain expertise to share, feedback on the approach, or want to follow the project's progress - we'd like to hear from you.

Received. Thank you.

We'll follow up directly if there's a fit for collaboration or when the project reaches its next milestone.